1. Introduction
This report describes progress on the analysis of data from an
experiment in the N. E. Atlantic, during the first mission of
the Shuttle Imaging Radar, SIR-C/X-SAR, in April 1994. The subjects
being investigated are:
(i) the behaviour of the mean and distribution of the backscatter
cross-section s0 from the
sea surface;
(ii) synthetic-aperture radar (SAR) imaging of ocean waves; and,
(iii) SAR imaging of oil slicks.
The SAR data obtained in this experiment consist of simultaneous,
co-registered observations in horizontal (HH) and vertical (VV)
polarisations, at both L (1.2 GHz) and C band (5.3 GHz). Observations
were also obtained in VV polarisation at X band (9.5 GHz), but
these were not precisely co-registered with those at L and C bands.
The site was imaged on sixteen occasions, through a combination
of ascending and almost orthogonal descending passes. The data
were calibrated, typically to within ± 2 dB at L and C bands
and within ± 1 dB at X band. Simultaneous wave measurements
were obtained from a directional wavebuoy, deployed from an Ocean
Weather Ship which also monitored the meteorological conditions.
Low to moderate wind speeds (from about 5 to 10 m s-1)
and mild sea states (significant wave heights mostly below 3 m)
were encountered. Artificial oil slicks, consisting of a surface-active
material known as ICI Emkarox, were deployed from the ship before
most of the SAR data-takes.
2. Backscatter Properties
2.1 Mean Backscatter
We have compared the observed mean s0
values with predictions using the wind speed and direction and
the range of incidence angles at each time of imaging. Empirical
and theoretical models have been assessed as follows.
(i) Empirical models We have tested two alternative scatterometer
model functions, CMOD-3 and CMOD-4, developed for the ERS-1 wind
scatterometer at C band, VV polarisation, as well as models developed
at L and C band by Snoeij et al. (Delft University) from
aircraft data obtained during the TOSCANE-2 campaign off Brittany.
CMOD-3 and CMOD-4 fit the data within 1 - 2 dB, hence giving confidence
in the calibration of the data at C band. The model of Snoeij
et al. shows a small but significant discrepancy with incidence
angle; predicted cross-sections are 2 dB or more too high at incidence
angles below about 25º. We therefore cannot rule out the
possibility of residual calibration errors at L band in the SIR-C
or TOSCANE-2 data.
(ii) Theoretical models We have tested the predictions
of composite-surface and Kirchhoff-based (Holliday et al.)
scattering theories, applied to assumed descriptions of surface
wave spectra developed by Donelan & Pierson (DP) and by Donelan,
Banner & Jähne (DBJ, as described by Apel). The DP spectrum
overestimates the cross-section by
5 -7 dB. The composite-surface model with the DBJ spectrum fits
well at C band, but shows systematic misfits with incidence angle
at L band and with wind speed at X band. The Kirchhoff-based scattering
model shows the same systematic misfits, but gives poorer fits
in HH than in VV polarisation. We conclude that, while the results
at L band may be caused by a residual calibration error in the
data, those at X band reflect a need to modify the short-wave
end of the DBJ spectrum. Specifically, its dependence on wind
speed is too strong to be consistent with the X-SAR data.
2.2 Backscatter Distribution
In order to quantify the observed backscatter distributions, we
have plotted normalised moments of the image intensity as a function
of their order. Figures 1 and 2 compare the results for single-look
and multi-look images of the same data-take at L band, HH polarisation.
In this case, and for all the available data-takes, we find that
the single-look data fit closely to a K distribution, whereas
the multi-look data fit closely to a lognormal distribution. This
distinction has a significant impact on the setting of thresholds
to minimise 'false alarms' in marine-target detection.
We find that the observed second moments of image intensity in
the SIR-C/X-SAR data can be explained by the modulations of ocean-surface
waves. This result comes from applying 'quasi-linear' wave-imaging
theory (a linear wave-imaging transfer function plus the 'azimuth
fall-off' effect of random wave motions) to the simultaneous buoy
measurements collected at the times of imaging. However, relatively
large hydrodynamic modulations have to be assumed. Our values
are generally consistent with those inferred from tower-radar
data.
3. Ocean-Wave Imaging
Initial results on two orbits were reported at IGARSS'95. Good
agreement was found between the SAR and simultaneous buoy measurements
of the wavelengths and directions of the dominant swell waves,
although the SAR data showed a small but significant rotation
of the position of the spectral peak with changing radar frequency.
Subsequent analysis of the other orbits has confirmed the imaging
of spectral peaks due to wind seas as well as swell waves. In
some cases multiple peaks are imaged by the SAR but are not resolved
by the buoy. Sometimes the relative magnitude of the peaks changes
with radar frequency or polarisation.
The simultaneously available radar frequencies and polarisations
provide a sensitive test of the wave-imaging mechanisms. For example,
we find that the polarisation dependence of the imaged wave modulations
is correlated with the swell direction relative to range (Figure
3). This may be explained in terms of the influence of the tilting
imaging mechanism, which is strongly dependent on polarisation
and which is strongest in the range direction.
Comparison is currently in progress between the SAR image power
spectra and the predicted spectra, obtained by applying wave-imaging
theory to the simultaneous buoy data. Our approach is more thorough
than those of other investigators, as we are taking account of
agreement not only in the wavelength and direction of the spectral
peaks, but also in their magnitude and in the total power in the
spectrum. (The test of the total power is the same as that summarised
in Section 2.2 to model the observed second moment of image intensity.)
Figure 4 shows an example comparison for Orbit 47, which is dominated
by near-range travelling swell. This case tests predominantly
the tilting and hydrodynamic wave-imaging mechanisms. The latter
in particular is not well understood. The SIR-C/X-SAR observations
are demonstrating an ability to constrain its magnitude, phase
and directional distribution. Figure 5 shows example results from
combined HH and VV polarisations at L band. On Orbit 47, the magnitude
and phase of the hydrodynamic modulation are relatively well constrained
by the tests, but the directional dependence is not. On Orbit
51 (near-azimuth travelling waves) the reverse is true: consistent
fits are only obtained with a weak directional dependence, but
a wide range of magnitudes and phases is allowed. Similar modelling
for the other data-takes is currently in progress.
Most of the analysis has been undertaken with multi-look images,
but some complex single-look images have also been investigated.
These provide a more accurate filtering of the speckle component
in the image power spectra, leading to a more accurate definition
of the imaged wave structure. The analysis procedure has been
described by Cordey & Macklin (published in IEEE Transactions
on Geoscience & Remote Sensing, 1989). Our initial analysis
here has demonstrated that the SIR-C and the X-SAR complex data
are both free of processing artifacts and hence suitable for the
technique. A demonstration of the impact on the assessment of
ocean-wave imaging theory is currently in progress.
4. Oil-Slick Imaging
An experiment was performed to investigate the effects of surface-damping
slicks on radar imaging of the sea surface. Films consisting of
the surface-active material ICI Emkarox were deployed at various
times before most of the SAR data-takes. This chemical has potential
to become an environmentally acceptable tracer for ship detection
and the monitoring of surface shear flow, with implications for
pollution monitoring.
The experiment itself was completed successfully. Initial inspection
of the images shows slicks most clearly imaged at the lowest wind
speeds encountered. A more thorough analysis will be undertaken
later this year. This will investigate how the slick contrast
in the image depends on the radar parameters (frequency, polarisation
and incidence angle), wind speed, and exposure time before the
Shuttle overpasses.
5. Conclusions and Future Plans
The studies already undertaken have demonstrated the significance
of this data-set in improving the understanding of radar backscattering
from the sea surface and the imaging of ocean waves. It has been
possible to test empirical and theoretical models of the mean
backscatter cross-section and to identify where modifications
are required. The accurate calibration achieved by SIR-C/X-SAR
has been crucial to this aspect.
The behaviour of the backscatter distribution has been studied.
The image variance can be explained in terms of the influences
of speckle together with ocean-wave modulations. However, differences
in the behaviour of single-look and multi-look images are not
yet fully understood.
The multi-parameter SAR data and simultaneous buoy measurements
have demonstrated an ability to test ocean-wave imaging mechanisms.
This analysis, along with the interpretation of the oil-slick
imaging activity, remains to be completed later this year.
We anticipate that this data-set will lead to further investigations.
The possibilities are still under discussion, but they include
study of the benefits of fusing the different radar channels to
improve maritime target detection or to recover more accurate
estimates of directional wave spectra.
6. Publications
The following publications have been produced on the work described
here.
6.1 Journal and Conference Papers
'First Results from the SIR-C/X-SAR Experiment on Ocean-Wave Imaging
in the N.E. Atlantic', G.E. Keyte, R.A. Cordey, R. Larsen &
J.T. Macklin, Proc. IGARSS '95, Firenze, Italy, 10-14 July 1995,
pp 1320-1322.
'Radar Backscatter Statistics from the Sea Surface: Implications
of SIR-C/X-SAR Observations for Maritime Surveillance', J.T. Macklin,
N.R. Stapleton, N.A. Robertson & R. Ringrose, Proc. NATO-AGARD
Symposium, 'Space Systems as Contributors to the NATO Defence
Mission', Cannes, France, 3-6 June 1996, in press.
'Radar Backscatter Statistics from the Sea Surface: Implications
of SIR-C/X-SAR Observations from the N.E. Atlantic', J.T. Macklin
& N.R. Stapleton, J. Geophys. Res. (Oceans), submitted November
1996.
'Ocean Radar Backscatter Statistics from Shuttle Imaging Radar
SIR-C/X-SAR Observations', C. Anderson & J.T. Macklin, submitted
to RADAR-97, Edinburgh, Scotland, 14-16 October 1997.
6.2 Internal Reports
'SIR-C Trials in N.E. Atlantic', R. Larsen & P.R. Dovey, GEC-Marconi
Research Centre Report MTR 94/32A on DRA Contract RAE1B/89, August
1994.
'A Study of Ocean Clutter Characteristics Using Multi-Parameter
Radar', N.R. Stapleton, J.T. Macklin & P.J. Saich, GEC-Marconi
Research Centre Report MTR 96/02A on DRA Contract CSM2/155, January
1996.
'Polarimetric Radar Clutter Characteristics of Ocean and Land Scenes', C. Anderson, P.A. Wright, J.T. Macklin & R.A. Cordey, GEC-Marconi Research Centre Report on DRA Contract CSM/494, in preparation 1997.
Acknowledgements
GEC-Marconi Research Centre was funded for its contribution to this work by the Defence and Evaluation Research Agency, Farnborough, under Contract Nos CSM2/155 and CSM/494. We thank the Jet Propulsion Laboratory and the German Aerospace Research Establishment (DLR) for providing the calibrated SIR-C and X-SAR data, respectively, and the participants in the N. E. Atlantic experiment for collecting the in situ data.
Figure Captions
Figure 1. Comparison of the normalised moments of order n
= 2 to 6 observed on a single-look SIR-C image with the predicted
dependences of lognormal, K and Weibull distributions which match
the observed second-order moment.
Figure 2. Comparison of the normalised moments of order n
= 2 to 6 observed on a multi-look SIR-C image (the same case as
in Figure 1) with the predicted dependences of lognormal and K
distributions which match the observed second-order moment.
Figure 3. Ratio of swell-wave modulations in HH to VV polarisation
in the image power spectra at L band, plotted against the swell-wave
direction relative to range.
Figure 4. SAR-image power spectrum, directional wavebuoy spectrum,
and predicted image power spectrum for Orbit 47 (near-range travelling
swell waves) at L band, HH polarisation.
Figure 5. Model fits to magnitude mh and phase fh of hydrodynamic modulation, from comparison of SAR spectra with simultaneous buoy data. Top: Orbit 47 (near-range travelling waves), bottom: Orbit 51 (near-azimuth travelling waves), both at L band, combined HH and VV polarisations. Each plot shows the constraints from (left to right) total power, swell direction, magnitude of the spectral peak, and the combined result of all three constraints. Filled squares indicate cases which agree. mh runs from 0 to 24, and fh from -90° to +90°.